The Weekly | The Hunt for Jeffrey Epstein’s Hidden Files


[You can watch “The Weekly” on FX, Hulu, and in these areas exterior the U.S.]

Producer/Director John Pappas

When an enormous bear of a person in flip-flops confirmed up with a bottle of Japanese whiskey promising to ship proof implicating among the world’s richest and strongest males in an epic cover-up of sexual misconduct, our reporters had been hooked.

The man glided by a pseudonym, Patrick Kessler, and he stated he had terabytes of video surveillance from Jeffrey Epstein’s residences and different supplies that, if true, would validate theories Epstein was engaged in an in depth blackmail operation. Kessler stated he would share all of it with The New York Times.

As his outrageous story started to unravel, he illuminated one thing else: how two of America’s high legal professionals thought of utilizing the promised trove of Epstein info.

This particular hourlong episode of “The Weekly” tells the wild story of 4 Times reporters chasing one of many greatest tales of the 12 months – if solely it had been true. In the course of their reporting, they get a uncommon glimpse into the secretive world of authorized settlements during which rich persons are allowed to make damning proof disappear.

[Join the dialog about @theweekly on Twitter and Instagram. #TheWeeklyNYT]


More than a dozen New York Times reporters have been investigating the Jeffrey Epstein case, including several members of the Business desk, led by Ellen Pollock. For this special episode of “The Weekly,” the finance editor David Enrich and business reporters Jessica Silver-Greenberg and Emily Steel teamed up with Jacob Bernstein of the Styles desk to chase down a too-good-to-be-true lead in the Epstein case.

Among the many unusual things about this episode — and our reporting on this story — is the fact that we regrettably still have no idea who Patrick Kessler is. He seemed to appear out of the ether, and he continues to reside there.

From the first time we met him, he insisted that he would not disclose his identity. He agreed to sit for an on-camera interview — but only if we obscured his face. We generally don’t grant anonymity to such characters, but in this case we thought it was justified because it would allow us to share his voice and physical outline with viewers. Maybe you’ll hear him and know who he is.

We pushed him, sometimes gently and sometimes aggressively, to tell us. He always refused. He claimed to live within a three-hour radius of Washington, D.C., but we don’t know if that’s three hours by plane, train or car. Even if it’s by foot it doesn’t help much.

Many details he shared about his background didn’t hold up after fact-checking. Even his explanation for his motives seemed dishonest. In the end, we can only guess why someone would make up an elaborate claim about surveillance videos and spend many hours over the course of several months engaging lawyers and journalists.

We’re eager to hear your theories after you watch the episode.



Source link Nytimes.com

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *